🌐 Compiled from MSRB EMMA & public records · read-only public record · debt as of Sep 11, 2026 · latest trade Oct 21, 2019 · latest filing Oct 12, 2010
Bonds issued forEconomic development
Credit ratings
not compiled
No agency ratings have been compiled for this issuer from EMMA’s per-security feed. This is a coverage gap, not a statement that the issuer is unrated — ratings may be stated on the official statements or the rating agencies’ own sites.
Maturity profile
par maturing by year · as of Sep 2026
Recent activity
rating actions & filings
Official statement posted
Oct 12, 2010 · INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS (PIVOTAL UTILITY…
Official statement posted
Nov 20, 2009 · INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS (TUFF FLORIDA TECH PROJECT…
Official statement posted
Feb 15, 2006 · IND DEV REV BDS DESIGNERS CHOICE CABINETRY INC 2006
In context
Larger than 73% of FL issuers by debt outstanding · #542 of 1974
Debt overview
EMMA-derived
Outstanding par (EMMA est.)—
Securities2
Callable0%
Debt service
estimated principal + interest by year
Estimated at current coupons — principal at maturity plus a full year’s interest on bonds still outstanding. Compiled from EMMA security data; not a substitute for the official statement.
Outstanding securities
2
Outstanding securities for Brevard County Florida Industrial Development Revenue
What the public record shows about this issuer’s disclosure practice. Compiled from the MSRB’s EMMA and from award letters governments record themselves. MuniPro confers no credential and issues no rating.
Credentials on record
Conferred by GFOA, recorded from the award letter. Never inferred.
Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting
No receipt on file
Distinguished Budget Presentation Award
No receipt on file
Popular Annual Financial Reporting Award
No receipt on file
Nothing recorded here means nothing has been recorded — not that an award was withheld.
Dated obligations
Filings a law or contract puts a date on.
Not measured
MuniPro does not hold this issuer’s own continuing-disclosure undertaking date, so no filing is called late here. Why →
Record quality
Disclosure practice — not an assessment of creditworthiness.
Annual reporting compiled
0 of 5
0 of 5 reporting years (2021–2025) have an annual financial filing compiled from the MSRB’s EMMA. The denominator is MuniPro’s 5-year reading window — it is NOT a filing obligation, and a missing year here means no filing was compiled, not that one was owed and skipped.
Record freshness
Not measured
No continuing-disclosure filing with a usable posting date has been compiled for this issuer, so there is no age to report. EMMA rows scraped without a date are excluded rather than dated 1900 — an unknown date must not be published as a 46,000-day age.
Filing timeliness
Not measured
Timeliness needs the date this issuer’s own continuing-disclosure undertaking sets. MuniPro does not hold it, and will not substitute a generic interval.
Standing describes disclosure practice — not an assessment of creditworthiness. It is not a rating, a rank against other governments, or a MuniPro credential.
See the full computation →
Frequently asked questions
Outstanding securities, official statements, and continuing-disclosure filings are compiled from the MSRB’s EMMA system and other public records. This profile is auto-compiled and has not yet been claimed by the issuer.
No. BondGov aggregates public information for transparency. Nothing here is an offer, solicitation, or recommendation. Consult the official statement and your own advisors before investing.